by
Tom Gilmore
The End of the Century: The Story of the Ramones
Rhino Home Video, 2005
"They
were like the military," says Debbie Harry about
the Ramones in this fascinating, hilarious, and ultimately
tragic documentary directed by Michael Gramaglia and Jim Fields,
now on DVD. The military isn't the first thing that comes
to mind when you think of the Ramones, but she has a point:
The 1-2-3-4, the uniforms, and the almost unvarying approach
from album to album all lend the group a discipline not often
associated with punk music. 
Yet for all their attempts at creating the illusion of brotherhood,
this documentary is most successful at overturning that, and
exposing Ramones for who they really were: Old friends often
in conflict and sharing little in common other than a band
and the assumed last name. How did they ever stay together?
you might justifiably wonder. But then, maybe this is precisely
why they lasted.
As a documentary it doesn't do anything stylistically out
of the ordinary, but convention is OK here since dramatic
narrative is so outstanding. The film is composed primarily
of talking heads, including all the Ramones and their peers;
piece by piece, this is how the story is told. The mix of
characters is so captivating that at times the film shifts
away from the group and becomes about the person in front
of the camera. Witness Johnny's cynical delivery or, alternately,
Dee Dee's demented manner—both are head-scratching cases
of this; how they say it is every bit as important as what
they say. And so the film is also a series of character studies,
as well as a glimpse at the collective.
One way to inject a bit of drama into a documentary is to
rely on the old fictional device of good guy / bad guy. The
Ramones playing themselves add this element without any invention
required. It's difficult to sympathize with Johnny, and he
comes out looking the worst. Stealing Joey's girlfriend is
forgivable in time, but his cold reaction to Joey's death
is odd and unsettling. Anybody who knew Johnny well might
tell you there was a very likeable person underneath the leather
jacket and the iron exterior. Maybe, but it's not apparent
here, and it's Johnny who gives the story its most sinister
quality. He’s never satisfied with anything. He’s
stoic, and seemingly incapable of love.
Joey, on the other hand, was an introvert until he stood
in front of a mic, at which point he partly emerged from his
shell, though always remaining shy and awkward, forever hiding
behind the hair and sunglasses. Perhaps the most likeable
Ramone, his lyrics are the stuff of classic pop, concerned
with love as much as anything. In what seems like an imitation
of something Joey
wrote about, Johnny steals his girlfriend, giving Joey material
for a few songs but enough pain to last until the band was
finished. Although the two continued to play side by side
for more than fifteen years, the relationship became strictly,
and sadly, professional.
The oddest of the bunch is easily the riotous, childlike
Dee Dee (“The awful six year old,” as one friend
describes him). His story of why he became a rapper in the
eighties is comical, even charming. "When he’d
[Schooly D] say ‘What time is it? Gucci time,’
I understood that,” said Dee Dee about this period.
When he shows up at the airport to fly to a Ramones gig after
coming from a Dee Dee King session, the band makes him change
from his sweats and gold chains into his Ramones-issued getup.
His self-absorption, no doubt resulting from years of drug
abuse, reaches a funny but pathetic peak in his acceptance
speech at the Rock 'n' Roll Hall of Fame when he thanks only
himself.
Tommy, the first in a long line of drummers, was the most
grounded of the four and he forces you to conclude that his
relative stability is the reason he left the band so very
early on. He stayed around as an off and on producer, continuing
to play a part in shaping the band’s destiny. His reflections
are level and sincere, giving some sanity to the otherwise
unpredictable mess.
| One
of the most frustrating things about the Ramones was their
insistence on fame. The ethos is decidedly not punk. |
|
One of the most frustrating things about the Ramones was
their insistence on fame long after they'd achieved what most
bands only dream of: massive cult status, hordes of fans,
critical acclaim, sold out gigs, etc. The band's wish for
some kind of Faustian bargain never appears to them in a satisfying
way, and most of the frustration seems to originate from Johnny.
“Anybody else would be happy if they have what we have,”
said Dee Dee, summing up twenty-odd years of disappointment.
The ethos is decidedly not punk, and at odds with today's
climate in which thousands of bands couldn’t care less
with success at that level.
Some think their acceptance into the Rock 'n' Roll Hall of
Fame was ironic, whereas I think it's a further sign of just
how mainstream they actually were. Their significance was
securely established with the release of their cornerstone
debut album and if this was all they ever gave the world they'd
be no less important. Even in 1985 they were probably the
most popular punk group after, perhaps, only the Sex Pistols
and the Clash. There was a consensus on this long before they
appeared on the list of Hall of Fame inductees so who is it
ironic? How many bands are revered in the same way? Couldn’t
they see that?
Then, lamentably, there's the quick decline. First Joey is
felled by cancer, then Dee Dee from a heroin overdose, and
soon after the film was finished Johnny also from cancer,
all dead within three years of each other, leaving Tommy as
the only original member still alive. Now CBGBs, which should
probably be considered an honorary Ramone, looks next in line
for the graveyard. It’s an era seemingly moments from
passing away for good. If there's something to take from this
incredible documentary, but more generally the Ramones, it's
this: Go find a band in your backyard to love before the city
starts naming streets for them and you find yourself busy
playing catch-up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Gilmore is assistant
editor of Inversion.
Thoughts on this article?
Write us.
|