By
Dan Tobin
WHEN THE BUGGLES launched MTV by declaring
that video killed the radio star, I wasn’t ready for
it. I was only five, and an uncool five. I didn’t know
James Brown from James Taylor from James Hetfield, I relied
on my next-door neighbor to inform me if Michael Jackson was
awesome or gay that week, and I thought Boy George was just
a colorful chap.
By junior high, MTV had become my primary source for music
to the exclusion of radio. When my mom saw a Poison video
with one too many bikini girls and banned MTV from our household,
I panicked that I’d never know what was popular and
never have friends. Radio was simply no longer an option.
Two decades later, MTV has branded itself to the point that
my generation is named after it. Of course, today’s
MTV is different than the one Martha Quinn hosted, and I’ve
added it to the list of things that were so much better back
in the day. For instance, Music Television used to play music
videos. And better videos. But I wondered, was I perhaps inflating
the “genius” of A-ha? I’d been waxing poetic
about WKRP in Cincinnati until I actually watched an old episode.
Was I was unfairly dismissing modern music videos in favor
of so-called “classics” that were as dated as
Dr. Johnny Fever?
Luckily nostalgia’s a multi-million dollar business
these days, and MTV Networks leads the charge. And so, watching
a few VH1 I Love the ’80s specials and an hour or two
of videos from the ’70s and ’80s on VH1 Classic
cleared everything up for me. Not only were videos better
20 years ago, pop culture as a whole was better. Or rather,
it’s worse now, and music videos are a decent barometer
of just how bad things have become.
I blame Michael Jackson. Of course “Billie Jean”
introduced story to videos, and “Thriller” elevated
the medium to an art form, but the MTV Video Vanguard Award
is named after Michael Jackson for a reason, and he should
be held accountable for the problems he created, too. Today’s
videos are too polished and take themselves too seriously.
That’s true of most pop culture in 2004, but it was
Michael who introduced these characteristics to videos. “Thriller”
was overblown, but it had a sense of humor: “No one
dead (or undead) was harmed in the making of this.”
| I’m
not
a video historian. But suddenly it didn’t seem like
a band rocking out playing their instruments was going
to cut it any more. |
An album later, Michael underwent surgery to lighten his
skin, narrow his nose, and eliminate his sense his humor.
The ten-minute black and white prelude to “Bad,”
directed by Martin Scorsese – Martin Scorsese! –
leads to a sneering Michael proclaiming he’s bad, he’s
bad, you know it. He’s got a leather jacket, he grabs
his crotch, and he’s backed up by street toughs. There
had been gangs in Michael Jackson videos before, but they
fought with choreographed dance routines. They dance in “Bad,”
but they also push Wesley Snipes.
I’m not a video historian, and I can't say for certain
that “Bad” was the first video to take itself
too seriously tonally. But suddenly it didn’t seem like
a band rocking out playing their instruments was going to
cut it any more. When Michael raised the bar again on “Black
and White” and “Remember the Time” with
cutting-edge computer effects, celebrity cameos, and premieres
on network television, the damage was already done. Any video
with a million-dollar budget has to take itself seriously.
Otherwise, why spend a million? Of course these days, the
million dollar videos ARE the cheap ones.
A HIT RECORD TODAY takes a catchy song,
a photogenic artist, a good Web site, appearances on Leno
and Letterman, a guest spot on TRL, well-coordinated magazine
stories, and possibly a scandal. And as Bill and Ted will
tell you, you need a triumphant video. MTV may never have
been an artists’ colony, but it wasn’t always
the big business it is today. It seemed like a lot more fun
when nobody knew what was going on. I remember watching a
short-lived local video channel called V-66 and not understanding
it, wondering if the radio was somehow choosing pictures to
put on TV. And I remember MTV taking chances, handing the
controls to Weird Al for a night, just because.
When videos weren’t yet part of the gigantic publicity
machine, they weren’t always in the budget. Robert Palmer
didn’t have much for “Addicted to Love,”
just a room, a tie ... he couldn’t even afford bras
for the models. And it’s a classic, every bit as good
as you remember. A few years later, when MTV had become the
advertising juggernaut it is today, Palmer made a big-budget
version of the same video for “Simply Irresistible.”
He wears a full suit, the camera whips around, and the models
behind him not only have bras but push-up bras. The production
values are better, but the magic is gone. It was there when
Tone Loc remade “Addicted to Love” on a lower
budget. Significantly worse acting from the models, no suit
or tie, no proper background, shot on a grainy black and white
camcorder, and yet “Wild Thing” knocked out “We
Are the World” as the biggest-selling single ever at
the time.
Duran
Duran
looked like they were having fun. 50 Cent doesn’t
know what fun is. |
But “Wild Thing” would never cut it today, not
with the slick epics that even the newest and worst bands
crank out. Neither would David Lee Roth’s notoriously
bad lip-syncing. What about all those ZZ Top videos with the
hotrod full of hot chicks who turn shlubs into Cinderellas,
the dudes with huge beards mysteriously appearing to hand
over the keys? That would be too goofy now. Same with the
Atari 2600 animation of “Money for Nothing.” It
was bad animation in 1987, but Michael Jackson hadn’t
yet morphed his dancers into each other in 1987. Videos didn’t
cause the age of irony, but they certainly didn’t benefit
from it. Duran Duran looked like they were having fun. Cyndi
Lauper and Captain Lou Albano did a whole video about wanting
to have fun. 50 Cent doesn’t know what fun is.
MTV set the agenda, but the people accepted it. And every
time audiences flock to a Jerry Bruckheimer special effects
bonanza, entertainers get the message that bigger, slicker,
more expensive is better. How easily we forget that Jaws was
great for NOT showing the shark. When you don’t have
the technology, you have to rely on things like story-telling
and writing. What kind of special effects did Aerosmith use
to battle Run DMC in the perfect “Walk This Way”
video? What camera tricks did Devo use in their weird and
wonderful “Whip It” and “Satisfaction”
videos? Are they really so much worse than Jay-Z on a yacht
doing …whatever it is he does?
WHAT VIDEOS DO PEOPLE LIKE NOW? People love
OutKast, and I give them credit for having fun, but they’re
as guilty as anyone of overproduction and a cookie-cutter
look. The Darkness are fun but inconsequential. I guess if
Oasis are geniuses for aping The Beatles, then the Darkness
are great for making Def Leppard videos. Sort of. Britney?
Middle-period Madonna with the “look of today.”
Eminem has a sense of humor but not a sense of fun. Too many
demons, not to mention a style that looks like everything
else. The super-quick editing that put MTV on the map makes
me seasick, and smacks of someone who has something to hide.
Some of the charm of old videos is in their simplicity. But
with innocence lost, I’m not sure we can go back.
| I
guess
if Oasis are geniuses for aping The Beatles, then the
Darkness are great for making Def Leppard videos. |
Of course, videos hardly matter any more. My musical tastes
have shifted toward genres where they just don’t make
videos. I’m not against pop music, but I am against
Justin Timberlake. And let’s not forget that no matter
how pretty the visuals are, if you don’t like the song,
the video probably can’t make up for it. MTV allegedly
still plays videos (though I have no idea when), but they’re
more about Ozzy, the Simpson sisters, and pretty kids fighting
over who ate their peanut butter. That ain’t working.
I thought the way you do is you play your guitar on the MTV.
Not any more, I guess.
But VH1 Classic is starting to fill the same role as oldies
stations. If I want to watch good videos, I don’t need
new videos. The people programming VH1 Classic know their
audience, and in any given hour, you’re going to see
one bona fide classic, or something you remember loving. Maybe
one day there’ll be an indie movement in videos like
there is in music, but maybe not. Until then, I’m happy
to rehash the past. The present doesn’t even come close.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Tobin ain’t bad;
Dan Tobin ain’t nuthin’. Dan Tobin ain’t
nuthin’! Well, he is a writer living in Los Angeles
and he maintains the weblog Surgical Strikes, available
at http://www.dantobindantobin.com
Thoughts on this article?
Write us.
|