
By
Chris Carroll
I’d been home from New Orleans a few days when a guy
down the street, an analyst for U.S. Homeland Security’s
immigration division, told me 700 or more of his agency’s
SWAT-type officers had been pulled off the borders, out of
airports, and wherever else they guard our nation from Salvadoran
drug gangs and kielbasa-smuggling Polish grannies, and sent
to patrol the ravaged Crescent City.
My first reaction was incredulity. Even at the height of
the widely-reported chaos—the looting, raping, murdering
and general lawlessness that was supposed to have reigned
in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina—my guess is that
those 700 tactical officers alone could have pacified the
whole city.
They could have guarded the food and water shipments that
should have been sent into the city right after the storm,
but weren’t. They could have escorted trucks carrying
portable toilets so people would not have had to crap in alleyways
or in muck-filled bathrooms with no running water. They could
have provided security for ambulance drivers picking up the
weakest and most vulnerable people trapped in New Orleans,
a number of whom died after sitting in the heat for days.
But to send the heavy cavalry in now, in mid-September? With
most of the population gone, and tens of thousands of National
Guard troops stationed at every other intersection, of what
possible use could these heavily-armed paramilitaries be?
Idiotic! my rational brain shouted.
| |
| In
the weeks after Katrina, New Orleans became nothing short
of the No. 1 vacation destination for cops and journalists. |
| |
My second reaction to the news—this from the part of
my cortex that controls my professional activities—was:
Good Times!
That’s right, folks. As usual, there’s a whole
side to this story you haven’t heard. The slanted, liberal
media doesn’t want you to know about it. For that matter,
neither do the fascist-leaning police and military organizations.
I don’t mind letting you in on a little trade secret,
though.
New Orleans in the weeks after Katrina became nothing short
of the world’s No. 1 vacation destination for two elite
groups of tourists: cops and journalists. Every major news
outlet and plenty of minor ones from around the world parachuted
journalists into New Orleans. It seemed that every U.S. city
and government agency, and dozens of small towns also volunteered
their sheriffs, patrolmen, or SWAT teams to go restore order.
It was like spring break for armed frats.
Think about it from the law-enforcement side. Why do people
enter the profession in the first place? Sure, the idea of
public service motivates some of them, but gimme a break.
Packing heat and ordering people around is the main attraction.
And if that’s what you like, policing in America don’t
get no sweeter than it was for the out-of-town officers pouring
into New Orleans, where you constantly had your M-4, your
MP5, even your trusty AK close at hand, even in the middle
of lunch with 50 other officers. Better yet, you had the Louisiana
governor practically encouraging you to smoke anyone causing
trouble. That made things exciting.
 |
 |
Let me make something clear, however: Most cops are family
men who have little or no desire to kill. Which is another
reason New Orleans in its destroyed state was such a nice
place to take a working vacation. By about September 3 or
4—aside from cops, soldiers, journalists and a few officials—there
was hardly anyone left to make trouble. They’d all been
bussed away to shelters in other cities.
Emptied out thusly, New Orleans became a real nice place to
wear your exotic sunglasses, your tac vest, your black paramilitary
outfits and boots, to carry your machine gun, and just to
hang out with your buddies and look intimidating. Paradise.
About the only people to try and intimidate, though, were
the hundreds, maybe thousands of print and broadcast journalists,
for whom post-Katrina New Orleans had became sort of a New
Prague.
I mean, it was so awesome because there were hardly any boring
Joe Schmoes around—only fascinating, and not infrequently,
rather hot, journalists. Early on, if you were a reporter
and you wanted to gather some heartbreaking content, all you’d
do was leave your hotel or air-conditioned TV truck and venture
a few blocks to the Superdome or the Ernest Morial Convention
Center. People were just lined up there—dehydrated,
exhausted, scared out of their minds. In short, they were
quote machines.
| |
| Reporting
on rapes and killings that probably didn’t happen
may have slowed delivery of aid to the suffering. But
in general, you agree, the media performed heroically.
|
| |
Once the people got shipped away, you could roam the echoing,
desolate streets, feeling conflicting emotions, sadness, disbelief.
You could perhaps make a pilgrimage to one of the bodies left,
almost as if for your benefit, to molder for days on 9th Street
downtown, or on Laurel Street in the Garden District area—and
then go back and write a story waxing eloquent about the shocking
thing that had befallen our nation. How could America sink
to third-world conditions! And then drink some looted liquor
with your buddies.
Sure, later on you’ll have to give some thought to
the fact that your histrionic reporting on rapes and killings
that probably didn’t happen may have helped to slow
the delivery of aid to the suffering—but in the whole
you and your colleagues agree that the media have performed
heroically.
If you are a TV correspondent, the anchor asks you on air,
“How can you hold up under such terrible strain?”
If you are a print journalist, you will give a radio interview
or write a first-person story when you return to your hometown—something
about your deepening state of post-traumatic stress disorder,
or perhaps about the hope for humanity you discovered in the
midst of despair.
I had to leave New Orleans right after the big mass of evacuees
was bussed away, and I’m sorry I had to miss what I
imagine were some of the best times in the empty city. But
before I left, something happened that has stuck with me.
I was picking my way through the debris on city streets in
my rented SUV. As I drove slowly toward one of my counterparts
in law enforcement, who was guarding an empty corner, I lifted
an index finger from the steering wheel. He nodded almost
imperceptibly in return. Our eyes met briefly, but long enough
for something to pass between us—something unsaid. Had
it been said, however, it might have been like this:
Me: "Sir, you and I have little in
common, but we're both here in our element, heroically doing
dirty jobs in a lawless and destroyed city, a little patch
of hell that has clawed its way to the surface of the earth."
Him: "Got that right, jack. Here you
got all the human misery you need for your little stories,
and I got the authorization I need to carry a long gun and
kick ass."
Me: "Indeed, my friend. Wherever I
turn, any random person I see in the street qualifies as a
'story' so to speak. What could be more convenient?"
Him: "Right on. An' if any thug bastard
tries anything crazy, I'm gonna light 'im up, no questions
asked."
Me: "So at this point, you’re
not going to have a problem, are you, if I flip the wheel
to the left and drive my SUV down the grassy median of the
road rather than steer carefully through the debris, right?
I'm going to leave tire tracks, go the wrong way up a one-way
street, and frankly, it’s going to be fun."
Him: "Be my guest, buddy. I ain’t
from around here. I still think reporters are liberal pussies,
but hey, it’s our town now."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Carroll, a writer
working in Washington, D.C., has a plan to solve the problem
of rising sea levels: it involves a mechanically-created
ring of frozen ocean water orbiting Earth, just like the
ring around Uranus.
Thoughts on this article?
Write us.
This page contains copyrighted
material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We make this material
available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental,
political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific,
and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes
a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this page
is distributed without profit to those who have expressed
a prior interest in receiving the included information for
research and educational purposes.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this page for
purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must
obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|