By
John Eklund
I was asked recently to name my favorite album of all time.
To a music junkie with an aversion to superlatives, this should
be a painful exercise. Yet Laura Nyro’s
Eli & the Thirteenth Confession (1968) springs
immediately to mind. I’ve burned through any number
of obsessions—musical and otherwise—over the past
35 years, but when I listen to those first few notes of “Timer,”
the sensation is as sharp as the day I first heard it on my
hippie girlfriend’s stereo in 1969. I thought it was
the most amazing voice I would ever hear, and I was right.
Uptown
Goin’ down
ole life line
walkin’ down faster
walkin’ with the master of Time
I was an absolutist and certain of everything then, so my
17-year-old self would not be surprised that I’ve stuck
with Laura. But my 54-year-old one, which gets less certain
of anything by the week, is a little startled to realize that
my love for her may be the only thing in my life that’s
survived the decades intact.
She’s an acquired taste, or so say some of the friends
I’ve tried to enlist. Her music over the course of ten
albums was full of contradictions. She wrote dozens of pop
songs which, when recorded by others (“Stoned Soul Picnic”
by the Fifth Dimension, “And When I Die” by Blood
Sweat & Tears) often sounded banal. Her melodies, especially
when she sang them, were always soulful, catchy, and meticulously
constructed. But her lyrics were eccentric, confounding, and
aggressively idiosyncratic. The early themes—love, betrayal,
religion, politics, the urban landscape, and, always, harmony—were
woven into the music in profoundly original ways.
Laura once described her own style as “bright gospel
rock,” and it’s the jazzy doo-wop musicality of
her tunes that has endured, and influenced dozens of other
artists. It’s as if she absorbed a little bit of every
pop genre in history, and remixed them into brilliant little
jewels that defy easy categorizing, and don’t seem to
even live in a recognizable time frame. Usually, there’s
nothing staler than old pop music, yet a Nyro tune, heard
by virgin ears, can rarely be accurately date-stamped.
| It’s
been said that Nyro ran from stardom—as if celebrity
is the natural state of things. |
|
A signature Nyro technique involves abrupt changes of tempo,
melody, and mood within a song. In “Money,” from
Smile (1976), a driving guitar hook, twitchy percussion
and intermittent angry horns accompany a bitter lament about
the increasing commercialization of modern life, and her own.
A good friend is a rare find
A good pimp’s gonna rob you blind.
But halfway though the song skids to a halt for a slow, ethereal
break that almost seems as if it’s from another record.
Mothers pull the night-time in
Calling their children with spoons in the wind.
And then it’s back to the hustle.
Listen to Eli or New York Tendaberry (1969),
the follow-up album, and ponder the unbelievable fact that
these songs were created by a teenager.
It’s been said that Nyro ran from stardom—as
if celebrity-hood is the natural state of things—and
shunning it is pathology. But she loved her audience and would
have loved a bigger one. A great purist, she simply valued
her integrity and artistic independence more highly than commercial
success.
Her creative choices did not always go down easy. For many
of us who got on board at the beginning, her later work was
a challenge. She abandoned the imagery of the dark side, the
devil and the captain, for lyrical preoccupations like motherhood,
animal rights, The Earth. These are the sort of topics that
makes me cringe when taken up by others. But she delivered
them with such utter warmth and sincerity, in a voice that
only seemed to get richer with age, and I forgave her every
time the rare new album wasn’t Eli.
I saw her in concert maybe a dozen times. It was always a
surprise to see the ferocity of her other fans, when my devotion
felt so personal, like it was just Laura and me. Once in Madison,
Wisconsin I spent all my money on red roses, my first floral
purchase ever, and left them at the theatre before the show.
My heart leapt when the curtain parted and they adorned her
piano. I later learned that a lot of other people had the
same idea, so whether they were actually mine will remain
a mystery.
Laura recorded her last album in 1993, Walk the Dog &
Light the Light. She died of ovarian cancer on April
8, 1997, one of the saddest days of my life.
----
For Angela
Davis, serious trouble began
in 1970 when she took up the cause of the Soledad Brothers,
three Black inmates in the California prison system who were
framed for the beating death of a white guard. They would
eventually be acquitted, but the most charismatic of the three,
George Jackson—a smart, political, literary prison activist,
with whom Davis fell in love—would be killed in prison
under suspicious circumstances.
 |
Jackson’s younger brother Jonathan, a 17-year-old revolutionary
(he published a newspaper at his Pasadena high school called
Iskra), had become an eloquent critic of the California penal
system. One day in August of 1970, he burst into a courtroom
where several inmates were on trial for assaulting a guard,
carrying a bag full of weapons, and crying “All right
gentlemen, I’m taking over now.” None of those
guns were ever fired, but he was shot and killed by courtroom
guards, along with the judge and two of the prisoners. Officials
and the press immediately alleged that Jonathan had hoped
to somehow force the release of his brother, George, who was
nowhere near the courtroom. The guns he brought in were registered
to Angela Y. Davis. She was promptly indicted for murder and
conspiracy.
Davis had been a thorn in the side of California authorities
for several years. After studying at Brandeis, the Sorbonne
and the Goethe Institute in Frankfurt, she was hired as an
assistant philosophy professor at UCLA in 1969. That year,
she also joined the Communist Party. When called before the
State Board of Regents to explain herself, she said “Yes
I am a communist, and I will not take the Fifth Amendment
against self-incrimination because my political beliefs do
not incriminate me, they incriminate the Nixons, the Agnews,
the Reagans.”
She was promptly fired, under the logic that a communist
by definition is incapable of independent thinking and therefore
is professionally incompetent—a form of reasoning that
has made a comeback in the treatment of some Islamic scholars
at American universities. But a State Superior court ruled
this action unconstitutional and she was ordered reinstated.
California conservatives, who had just elected Ronald Reagan
governor, were enraged by this woman as she continued to expose
the excesses of the California prison system in her speaking
and writing. As the trial of George Jackson and his co-defendants
proceeded, it became increasingly clear that the evidence
against them was slim to non-existent. The scene was pure
spectacle, and full of shockingly racist treatment. At one
point the judge ordered the court audience to “conduct
yourselves properly and not sit as if you are in a pool hall
or at a barbecue table.”
The jury found the inmates innocent. But in this atmosphere,
convinced that a fair trial was impossible, Davis fled. After
the warrant for her arrest was issued, light-skinned black
women all over America were hauled in for questioning. She
was eventually arrested in New York in October 1970.
| After
her arrest warrant was issued, light-skinned black women
all over America were hauled in for questioning. |
|
There was a wave of immediate support from Black communities
across the country. Every black newspaper editorialized for
bail. James Baldwin, in “an open letter to my sister
Angela Davis,” mused that “one might have hoped
that by this hour, chains on black flesh would be so intolerable
a sight for the American people that they themselves would
rise up and strike off the manacles.”
Demonstrations swept the planet—thousands in African
cities, 60,000 in Paris, 100,000 in Moscow. Ossie Davis and
Gloria Steinem headed a fund-raising appeal. Aretha Franklin
offered to stand bail, saying “I’ve been locked
up for disturbing the peace. I know you’ve got to disturb
the peace when you can’t get no peace.”
The trial of this black intellectual communist woman was
a farce. There was no evidence presented that she knew Jonathan
had access to her legally registered guns or was planning
to invade the courtroom. Conspiracy was alleged yet never
demonstrated, and the not guilty verdict on June 4, 1972,
from the all-white jury was greeted with joy on six continents.
For 18 months I lived and breathed the “free Angela”
movement. Like small groups in every city, her Milwaukee supporters
raised money by hitting up wealthy liberals, selling chicken
dinners and holding car washes. We woke before dawn to distribute
flyers at plant gates, and collected signatures on petitions
at supermarkets and ball games. I had the feeling that they
would really not be able to get away with this. And when they
didn’t, I had the sense that we had stopped them.
In a letter from Angela, dated January 6, 1972, North County
Jail, Palo Alto, California, she thanks me for sending a package,
though I don’t recall what it was. “My gratitude
to you in Milwaukee who have contributed a part of your lives
to this struggle must be expressed in the form of a promise.
When I am finally able to experience once again the less diminished
freedom on the other side of these walls, my life will belong
in its entirety to the oppressed.”
Unlike many of us who relished the fights of the early 70s
but shrink from the harder ones of 2005, Davis kept her promise,
and works, writes and lectures relentlessly against “the
prison-industrial complex.
----
If you have read the novels of
Anita
Brookner, “fierce” is probably
not a word that comes to mind to describe her. I’m pretty
confident that her name has never appeared in the same sentence
as Laura Nyro and Angela Davis.
But she shares Nyro’s unshakeable creative integrity
and resistance to the demands of cultural commerce. An art
historian by training, Brookner began writing novels in her
mid-forties and has just published, unbelievably, her twenty-third,
Leaving Home. In 1984, her fourth book, Hotel
du Lac, won the Booker prize, but since then her sales
have stalled, and she now writes for a small but devoted audience.
Reviewers have faulted her for writing the same book again
and again, and it’s true that there are immediately
recognizable Brookner tropes: damaged lonely people, usually
but not always older single women, reflecting on the unfulfilled
life. Possibly the sort of people Nyro had in mind on “Lonely
Women,” a song she later dropped from her repertoire
as her feminist politics began to coalesce (No one hurries
home to lonely women is a lyric you would never find
in Nyro’s later work but is a sentiment rampant in Brookner’s).
My friend Robert, who is puzzled by my Brookner obsession,
suspects she is feeding my “inner spinster.” It
can take an entire novel for one of her self-conscious protagonists
to perform a simple act, but while the reader anticipates
this we are treated to many delicious layers of complex, nuanced
psychological reflection. She will be read in future centuries
for the reasons we read Jane Austen today.
A recent review of Leaving Home advised “If
you seek joy in your reading, be warned.” In Brookner
world, virtue is rarely rewarded, good does not necessarily
prevail over evil, and loneliness is a constant. In these
respects, at least, Brookner may be the anti-Angela Davis.
The confidence required of a political activist, the focus
on the world rather than the self, the optimism needed to
take on and prevail over the powerful, Brookner’s characters
are simply not up to it.
| She
writes one novel a year, in longhand, and never re-writes.
That such lush sentences could flow from her pen without
tweaking is a marvel. |
|
Yet I would suggest that Brookner is the most accomplished
and, in her own way, brave novelist writing in English today.
Every word in a Brookner novel has a hand-picked flavor, every
phrase exudes style, and the books as a whole are as elegantly
written and artfully constructed as any contemporary novel
you’re likely to read. Her Polish-Jewish origins and
her grounding in nineteenth-century novels, especially French,
Russian and English, give her work a sad, wistful European
sensibility.
She doesn’t travel, she doesn’t do television
and radio, she does nothing really to help her books along
once published. In my 23 years as possibly her most devoted
American reader, I have never heard the sound of her voice.
She writes one novel a year, over the course of a summer,
in longhand, and never re-writes. That such lush and interesting
sentences could flow from her pen without tweaking is a marvel.
For Laura Nyro and Angela Davis, love is a major theme. Anita
Brookner once offered these thoughts on the subject:
There are two kinds of love. There’s the one impossible
love that really takes up all your dreams and all your longings
and that rarely resolves itself into anything practical.
The love you settle for may be simply a form of friendship
in which there’s no fear, no dread, no anxiety, and
you’re very wise if you do settle for that, except
that the true romantic never can. Romantic love is a terrible
thing. It is a form of madness, I think, and the people
who are never visited by it are extraordinarily lucky. I
don’t think it’s got anything to be said in
its favor. Except that it does sweep you up to a very exalted
level of feeling. But it’s also very punishing. I
think it’s more creative than the other kind. It enables
you in an extraordinary way. It gives you powers you didn’t
know you had. You discover yourself.
Last year, while in London, I learned from my friend Kate
that Anita Brookner could be seen every Saturday morning shopping
at the Waitrose supermarket in Chelsea. Naturally, I had to
go. I staked out a vantage point across the street and lurked.
At 8:25, as promised, Brookner rounded the corner. She looked
exactly like herself: sensible shoes, a smart plaid suit,
carefully coiffed hair, and those huge blue eyes that have
stared out from the jackets of all those books.
I followed her into the store, keeping a discreet distance,
and watched as she selected an orange, a yogurt, a can of
soup—just the sort of shopping a Brookner character
might do. I wanted to speak to her but eventually, when she
began to pick over cosmetics, I became self-conscious. My
stalking seemed an invasion of privacy. I lost my nerve and
fled.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Eklund is a book rep.
He lives in Milwaukee.
Thoughts on this article?
Write us.
|